Sunday, September 06, 2009

Judge orders restoration of services to elderly and disabled adults

The Washington State Legislature went through a grueling session a few months ago. A several billion dollar shortfall necessitated drastic decisions. The Democratic Govenor, Democratic Senate, and Democratic House chose mostly deep cuts in services and no tax increases to solve the problem. There were many disappointed citizens. Even the Republican Party of No! was not happy in the end. But, many recipients of services and their families were devistated.

On Friday, a Judge ordered some services to be reinstated.

Here's the story:

By Christine Clarridge Seattle Times staff reporter

A U.S. District Court judge has ordered that the state restore Adult Day Health services to elderly and disabled people, at least temporarily.

District Court Judge Richard A. Jones issued an injunction to restore the benefits received by about 950 Washington adults who were cut off from nursing and therapy services as a result of statewide budget cuts to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS).

Citing extraordinary budget pressures, the state Legislature earlier this year cut funding for Adult Day Health, which provided social and medical therapy to vulnerable adults living at home or in community-residential services.

The cuts went into effect on July 1.

According to Louise Ryan, a spokeswoman for Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, however, the state violated federal Medicaid and due-process law by failing to give clients proper notice or seek replacement services for those affected.

"The sudden loss of skilled services has been devastating for many of these very frail and vulnerable people," Ryan said.

Ryan said that people who had lost their services should contact their Adult Day Health provider immediately.

The lawsuit was initially filed on behalf of 27 adults who had been cut off from the adult day-care services, but the judge certified the case as a class-action lawsuit.

DSHS has defended the cuts, saying that in these tough economic times the needs of vulnerable people must be weighed against those who have equal or greater needs.

In a written order released on Friday, Judge Jones said the injunction was temporary and the state could seek to make the cuts again once it gives recipients proper notice.

"The court also understands that certain budgetary decisions must be made that may adversely impact certain classes of our citizenry," Jones wrote. "The court will not, however, countenance such decisions when their implementation violates fundamental due-process rights. The record is clear that DSHS's termination actions did not comport with due process."

According to the ruling, DSHS must reinstate Adult Day Health benefits to all the adults who previously had been receiving benefits until the department is able to make meaningful reassessments of individual needs, issue timely notices of a reduction or termination in services and give information about alternative community-based support services.

The injunction is one of several that have been granted in response to the state's effort to cut services to vulnerable individuals.

In June, a U.S. District Court judge in Tacoma issued an injunction preventing the state from cutting the number of hours of in-home care provided to families who care for their special-needs children at home.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
0 Comments

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

When is collective bargaining NOT collective bargaining?

Evidently, collective bargaining doesn't mean bargaining-in-good-faith when done in the State of Washington.

The state employee's union bargained and won collective bargaining rights in 2002. In 2008 current Governor Christine Gregoire negotiated with the State Employee Union for contracts containing the following provisions:


*State employees recently agreed to 2% wage increases.

*SEIU and the governior's office agreed to pay hikes of 25-cents an hour in 2009 and 22-cents an hour in 2010 for 23,000 workers who care for seniors and people with disabilities.


Following those negotiations, the Revenue Forcasts have gone in the tank. Even though both sides agreed to the negotiations, the proposed contract would have to be put to the Washington State Legislature to approve or deny without the opportunity to amend according to Washington State Law.

The Governor took those negotiated raises out of the budget she intends to send to the legislature rather than fund the raises to which she previously committed.

Both the State Employees and SEIU have filed suit.

It would seem to put a real damper on negotiations if, after agreement, the Executive Branch could ignore their previous agreement because the budget got tight.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
0 Comments

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Dino Rossi's guy: John McSame!

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
0 Comments

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

"Nunya Bizness".... Dino Rossi.

Rossi the Decider: "I say which questions deserve an answer"


SEATTLE – Leading up to Washington’s caucuses, Gov. Chris Gregoire was open with voters about her presidential preference in the historic 2008 election, endorsing Senator Barack Obama. In today’s presidential primary, Republican Dino Rossi continues to conceal his choice for president from Washingtonians. Why?

Has Rossi not made up his mind?

Has Rossi simply not been asked?

Is Rossi not voting, just as
he didn’t participate in a caucus? The answer:
Republican Dino Rossi has decided his presidential preference, but flatly refuses to disclose who he’s supporting. After being asked repeatedly by the Seattle Times’ David Postman, Rossi stuck to his policy of only answering media questions he decides deserve an answer.
(Questions Rossi doesn’t want to answer constitute the media and others conspiring to “knock him off message.”)

Postman: “Rossi wouldn’t tell me who he backs for president. He said he’d vote in Tuesday’s primary, but said in a couple of different ways that he had no interest in letting me know his choice among the Republican field. … He said he will ‘stay on message’ no matter what. And the presidential race isn’t part of that.”
Recently, Rossi also flatly refused an interview regarding his views on Plan B contraception, likely due to fears of discussing his extreme social agenda that threatens to eliminate a woman’s right to choose in pro-choice Washington state.
By contrast, in a February 8th AP interview, Gov. Gregoire noted that taking a stand in the Democratic nomination wasn’t an easy decision, but was one where she owed it to Washingtonians to be open and honest.

“Lots of people said, 'Just stay out of it,' said Gregoire. But all of my friends are going to caucus on Saturday and will be asked to make up their mind, so why shouldn't I?”


While it is certainly true that Republican wannabee, Dino Rossi's opinion on pretty much anything is irrelevent, it is refreshing to have any candidate and a Republican candidate actually admit it.

link

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
0 Comments